Bedard
Bedard. |
Bedard has been a columnist at Car & Driver magazine for eons; probably since the ‘80s.
He was hired away from Chrysler Corporation in the ‘70s, where he had been a suspension engineer.
At first he was one of the grunts that put together the magazine, but now is just a columnist and editorial contributor.
He raced for a while, mainly Showroom Stock when Ford’s Pinto raced the Chevrolet Vega.
One time he picked up a used Vega sedan, and put everyone on-the-trailer. The Vega was compromised, probably the worst car GM ever fielded, but it sure could handle.
Incredibly stiff (when not rusted), and well balanced.
I had one myself, a Vega GT. About the only thing wrong it did was jump sideways in a corner if it hit a bump.
That was that heavy rear axle. Well located and stable, but heavy. It had so much momentum it took a while to get the tires back down on the pavement.
Bedard raced other things; a C/D Pinto, and eventually an Opel (“OH-pull”) that outhandled even the Vega.
It handled so well it was outlawed in Showroom Stock racing.
He then went on to race a Mazda rotary that trounced everything.
Don’t know as it handled that well, but it was incredibly powerful.
He went on to race Indianapolis — an Indy-car powered by a turbocharged Buick V6 motor.
There were a few other Turbo-Buicks racing at that time, but I don’t know as they ever won anything.
Too fragile.
Bedard’s racing ended when he flipped his Indy-car 89 bazilyun times.
The accident nearly killed him, but didn’t. He survived incredible violence.
I’ve always liked Bedard’s writing; very spare and to-the-point. He has a habit of finding the right single word to express things.
He also thinks about things at a higher level than the average person.
Unfortunately, he’s very much a car-enthusiast, so he tends to be somewhat a tub-thumper.
Recently he used questionable statistics to pan transit.
Every time I see that I think of PATCo, the incredibly successful rail-transit line that attracted Philadelphia commuters out of their cars in south Jersey.
This month’s column (June, 2009) suggested, in essence, that Obama’s Green-Power initiatives are like trying to change the direction of a cruising aircraft carrier.
Ya don’t just turn it around.
The total contribution in power-generation of wind and solar is 45,493,000 megawatt hours, 1.1 percent of the 4.118 billion megawatt hours generated nationwide over 12 months.
A lot of that total is generated by burning carbon; coal and natural-gas.
Wind and solar are subsidized HUGELY; way more than coal and natural-gas.
Bedard suggested nuclear is a better deal; it’s subsidy not much more than coal.
But of course nuclear is on-the-outs — it generates extremely toxic waste material.
So where do we go?
Doubling Green-Power generation, as Obama promised, won’t make much of a dent when burning carbon dominates as much as it does.
For those not knowing, I have seen the future, and it’s from the Mulholland Drive overlook in the Hollywood hills.
That view was used many times as background for TV sets; a grid of lights spreading out toward the horizon.
I saw it again not too long ago, and the grid has filled in. It’s become a solid carpet of light.
It’s not a grid any more. —And something has to be pushing all those lights. Acres of coal are being burned, spewing the atmosphere with carbon-dioxide.
One morning you could see all the mountains surrounding the L.A. basin; and the next morning everything was socked in with thick smog.
Also interesting was a recent comment by another columnist, one Kevin Cameron at Cycle-World magazine.
Cameron was once a mechanic and tuner in motorcycle racing, and is interested in technical stuff.
His son suggested switching to plug-in electric cars, charged by the electric-grid, is just switching from gasoline to coal.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home