Monthly calendar report for February
THE WINNER |
Photo by Jim Buckley. |
Pennsy J #6496 slogs into Bellevue, Ohio; July 1, 1956. |
The picture was taken in 1956, so #6496 looks a little neglected and battleworn, as did all Pennsy steam-engines as use of steam on the Pennsy wound down.
(Steam was discontinued on Pennsy in 1957.)
As mentioned earlier (Monthly calendar report for January, 2008), the J was not a true Pennsy engine.
Pennsy designed their steam-engines in-house, but didn’t do steam development in the ‘30s, because of -a) electrification, and -b) the many steam-engines electrification released.
So when WWII broke out, with its flood of traffic, Pennsy was stuck with tired old steam-engines from the ‘20s, and even the teens.
They had to go outside; they didn’t have time to develop a new steam-engine. —In fact, the War Production Board prohibited it.
Meanwhile, steam-locomotive development had leapt ahead during the ‘30s — primarily SuperPower from Lima (“LYE-mah;” not “LEE-mah”) Locomotive Works in Lima (“LYE-mah;” not “LEE-mah”), Ohio.
SuperPower was a big boiler and big firebox to generate prodigious amounts of steam; enough to not run out at constant high speeds.
The Pennsy J is the Lima SuperPower 2-10-4 designed for Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad, with slight modifications, mainly to make it Pennsy.
As such it lacks the trademark Belpaire firebox used on nearly all Pennsy steam-engines.
A Belpaire firebox isn’t round at the top, following the curvature of the boiler courses.
Connection of the firebox to the boiler has always been a challenge. That connection was prone to cracks and leaks, and could fail over time due to vibration.
Of course, the bottom of the firebox had to be flat to accommodate the fire grate, and the roof of the firebox was usually also flat, but the boiler-top over the firebox was round.
With a Belpaire firebox, the boiler-courses over the firebox-top were also flat (allowing a wider firebox roof), inviting difficulty where that area met the boiler.
But apparently Pennsy thought well enough of it to use the Belpaire design on just about every steam-engine. —Plus they engineered reinforcement into the design.
The J was also somewhat a misfit for Pennsy, since Pennsy was so mountainous it couldn’t allow high cruising speeds.
—Except west of the Alleghenies, where Js gravitated. The one pictured is on a north-south line in Ohio where a J could constantly cruise at 50+.
Js were also used on the slopes of the Alleghenies, and around Horseshoe Curve, but slogging uphill at 25-30 mph with a J was kind of a waste.
Yet the J was an extremely powerful locomotive, although my most recent Classic Trains Magazine relates one stalling uphill out of Indianapolis with over 100 cars.
The train made three attempts, and always stalled in the same spot.
On the fourth attempt it finally made it, but a small 600-hp diesel switcher was pushing on the rear.
Atop the grade, the switcher uncoupled and disconnected on-the-fly.
6496 may look a little tired, but there’s still that gorgeous red keystone number-plate.
C5 |
Photo by Richard Prince, I guess. |
The C5 (1997-2004) is somewhat of a mistake to Corvette cognoscenti, big and blowsy.
It followed the C4 (1984-1996), and proceeds the fabulous C6 (2005-to current)
The “C”-letter nomenclature is kind of recent. Earlier Corvettes weren’t called that, although they have since been classified as such.
The earliest Corvettes (through the 1962 model-year) are C1s, the Sting Rays (1963-1967) the C2s, and the third iteration (1968-1983) the C3s.
But they weren’t labeled that at that time.
Of course, the Corvette would have never succeeded without that fabulous Small-Block motor.
Then too there was Zora Arkus Duntov trying to extract ever more performance out of the ‘Vette.
I remember hitchhiking in a StringRay at Houghton.
It was a coupe, which meant you had to wedge your luggage between the seats — no opening trunk.
And it felt like I was riding in a drum.
Sure sounded like a drum — every bump echoing through the body.
A guy at the mighty Mezz had a red C5.
He was only a newspaper-carrier; which meant where did he ever get the money to purchase a newish C5?
I remember looking at it longingly, but it was rather large, and I remembered my drum-experience at Houghton.
We also passed a red C5 going to a WXXI shindig at Brock Yates’ house in Wyoming, N.Y.
The C5 was being driven by a divorced dentist, dapper in his tan-suade Tab Hunter blazer and plaid ivy-league cap, with his gorgeous trophy-wife riding shotgun.
Yates had apparently restored the mansion he was living in, and it was featured in a locally-produced classic homes program. (Yates is also a WXXI listener.)
Yates was once an editor at Car-and-Driver Magazine, but now is retired. Like me he’s a car-guy, and more-or-less led my car enthusiasm.
So here we are in our CR-V, driving through rural Wyoming County, and we pass the red C5. Divorced-dentist was pussy-footing it for fear of inflaming the local constabulatory — a red Corvette is cop-bait.
Yates had set aside a small tree-shaded grassy meadow for parking; and our CR-V has about 10 inches of clearance, the C5 about three.
In we go — I was terrified; “don’t know as I woulda tried that,” I said to divorced-dentist.
The front of his C5 was shoving the grass down as he navigated the meadow.
Photo by Shawn Conley. |
Norfolk Southern double-stack leaves Livernois Yard in Detroit in a snowshower with a single unit (#9601) on the point. |
Sadly, diesel locomotives have gotten strong enough any more that often one unit is enough for a freight-train on flat terrain; especially if that locomotive is alternating-current (AC).
(9601 is not alternating-current.)
At first, all diesel-locomotives were direct-current to the traction-motors like trolley-cars. The giant diesel-engine pushed a generator that generated direct-current for the traction-motors on the wheel-axles.
But technology has advanced, such that locomotives can have alternating-current traction-motors, which lug better than direct-current.
So now where one diesel-locomotive might be enough, earlier two or more diesel-locomotives were needed.
And two or more units wide-open climbing a hill was a thrill — “assaulting the heavens,” I always said. (The GEs are quieter than the old EMDs; which were two-stroke and very loud.)
Diesel-locomotives have gotten more powerful too.
The first EMD diesel-electric road locomotives (the FT, in 1939) were 1,350 horsepower.
Now we’re over 4,000 — 9601 is a Dash 9-40CW (a Dash 9-44CW derated from 4,400 horsepower to 4,000 horsepower — all Norfolk Southern Dash-9s were built to the lower rating).
So between alternating-current and increased horsepower, often one unit is enough.
The mighty Curve still rates two or more units, but often those lead units are enough to negate the need for helpers.
Helpers are still kept at the base of The Hill, and often added to trains.
But I certainly have seen enough trains climbing The Hill unassisted.
Photo by Philip Makanna. |
Hawker Hurricane (the airplane that won the Battle of Britain). |
“The Spitfire was a more exciting airplane, but it was the Hurricane that won the Battle of Britain,” he tells me.
The Spitfires shot down the Messerschmidts, but it was the Hurricanes that shot down the Nazi bombers.
Hurricanes often returned to base riddled with cannon-fire. The Hurricane could take a beating.
It’s too bad the photo is rather pedestrian — too dark.
The Hurricane is not as exciting to look at as the Spitfire, but I’m sure they weren’t a pleasant site to German bomber crews.
Belknap apparently read a book that said it was the Hurricane that won the Battle of Britain.
I always thought it was the Spitfire. His comments were an education.
Photo by Peter Vincent. |
The Mickey Ellis 1932 Ford roadster pickup. |
I suppose the February entry in my All-Deuce calendar is worth depicting, although I don’t think it’s a very good picture.
It’s a ‘32 Ford roadster pickup, looking pretty stock, except it has a 350 Chevy Small-Block driving through a 700R4 auto-tranny.
Ho-hum. The best ‘32s are the coupes: three-window and then five-window. Followed by the roadsters.
Worst of all are the sedans, but the pickups look better.
To my mind, a pickup is nowhere near as attractive as a coupe — plus a ‘32 Ford pickup is not as functional as an Advance-Design Chevy, which looks great, and would carry a lot.
A ‘32 Ford pickup won’t carry much of anything. It’s essentially a car — although you could get pickup beds to fit in the open trunks of coupes long ago. (They probably didn’t have much capacity either.)
My Audio-Visual Designs B&W All-Pennsy calendar isn’t worth depicting.
It’s a Pennsy freight with Alco power on the point. It’s on the storied Middle Division in Perdix, Pa.
Ho-hum. It least it’s Alco; which makes it worth publishing.
But it’s not a very dramatic picture.
Finally is my Three Stooges calendar.
Again, the Stooges only succeed in a movie. The pictures are probably single frames of movies — this looks rather familiar, a picture of Larry painting Curly’s head while Moe looks on aghast. It looks like an outtake from a Stooges movie where they are painters. Curly is looking the wrong way, and Moe looks unbelievable.
Such things would never get noticed in a movie, but in a picture they stand out like a sore thumb.
I doubt you could even pose the Stooges. Movies are their medium.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home